Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Click for Nokomis, Florida Forecast Proud member of the 
Read the Bills Act Coalition
Donations accepted patnok1@gmail.com
PayPal—eBay's service to make fast, easy, and secure payments for your eBay purchases!
07.survivor 071
This Month
February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29
    follow me on Twitter
    Recent Visitors
    Patrick - Fri 30 Jul 2010 01:03 PM EDT 
    jfk airport cab service - Thu 22 Jul 2010 01:26 PM EDT 
    corina - Wed 19 May 2010 03:11 PM EDT 
    Ruby - Thu 28 Jan 2010 01:48 AM EST 
    HELLOOOOOOOOOOOO - Sat 31 Oct 2009 08:24 AM EDT 
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Search
    Google

    This blog:

    Click here to join SarasotaVoices
    Click to join SarasotaVoices
    Re: Marker4 dock extension to go to hearing stay tuned
    by Patrick
    Hey, Pat. From a practical standpoint, I think a long dock there could be a problem for navigation, what with big boats sitting there waiting for the bridge to open. From a legal standpoint, I think if Konicnic owns the property and all the various regulatory agencies say it's legal for him to build it, then he ought to get to build it. I tend to come down on the side of property owners rights, even if we don't like what they are doing. Maybe I'm a closet Libertarian? - Jim perhaps you are Jim! heres how I see it.Nowhere in Sarasota county will New marinas be permitted. the only option to expand boater's services & access to the waterfront is to expand existing marinas. My understanding is the slips that are proposed will be for the recreational boaters to access the land i.e. downtown Venice (also marker4 but that goes with out saying) At this time there is nowhere to dock your boat & walk or bike to downtown Venice. The state & feds approved a 600'+ dock only to have the bcc sitting as the "harbor board" reduced the project back to the 400' that HAS been approved. I feel (by reading the np reports) that the boating public was poorly represented at the hearing this week.We have seen some suprising things come from this board in the past year. most good. the nav. issue is minimal at best or the state & feds would not of approved this. there is a lot of NIMBYism going on despite the fact that JK is going to GIVE the submerged lands THAT HE OWNS! to the MH park! beyond belief to me. we will see. I may speak to MR. K & see how me would feel about a turnout in his favor at the public hearing by local. recreational boaters
    Post comment:
      Receive comment notifications for this article
    Subject: 
    Comment: 
    Comment verification:

    Please enter the text you see inside the graphic to post your comment:
    You are not currently logged in. If you would like your user information to be displayed with your comment, please enter your login information below.
    Login information:
    Username: 
    Password: 
    If you would like to post contact information on your comment, please enter your information into the optional fields below:
    Contact information:
    Name: 
    URL:  example: http://yourdomain.com
    Email: 
    Please note: email will not be displayed on the site, only for the blog owner. If logged in, URL will only be used.